Find Key Cases

Browse key cases using the filter for either ‘Contravention type’ OR ‘Issue’. Alternatively, use the ‘Search…’ box to find cases through a custom query.

Cases on the site currently cover parking, bus lane, moving traffic and road user charging, including the London Congestion Charge and Clean Air Zones (outside London). More cases and contravention types will be added in due course.

Clear filters

Please note: All adjudicator decisions included on this website are in the public domain. While they have been curated together here for the convenience and interest of users, any information contained within the decisions remains the responsibility of the original adjudicating body. Any questions relating to the content of cases should also be directed to the adjudicating body.

Fife Council – v – Mrs M
2024UT04 Ref: UTS/AP/23/0032

Upper Tribunal for Scotland

Decision Date: 2023-05-29

Outcome: Dismissed

This case underscores that the responsibility rests with the motorist to purchase parking time for the correct vehicle  A contravention occurs when parking time purchased does not correctly identify the vehicle parked.  This applies even when the incorrect registration mark was entered in error. That a payment was still made is not relevant. The payment must be made for the correct vehicle, identified by the vehicle registration mark provided by the motorist.

The Scottish Upper Tribunal decision is binding on the Scottish First Tier Tribunal for Scotland (General Regulatory Chamber) and is a persuasive decision in other UK jurisdictions.

Mrs K – v – Birmingham City Council
(KW01851-2304)

Traffic Penalty Tribunal

Decision Date: 2023-05-24

Outcome: Dismissed

This case clarifies that the obligation on the motorist to be alert to signs and restrictions relating to a Clean Air Zone remains, even when relying on a satellite navigation system (“Sat Nav”).

Ms C – v – Derbyshire County Council
(DJ00019-2304)

Traffic Penalty Tribunal

Decision Date: 2023-05-21

Outcome: Dismissed

This case clarifies that there is no entitlement to park outside one’s home, or to occupy a restricted bay while waiting for a preferred space to become available.

Also covered is the fact that having no intention to park in contravention is not a ground of appeal, that a lack of available parking does not entitle a motorist to park in contravention, and that the adjudicator cannot consider mitigating circumstances.