Find Key Cases
Browse key cases using the filter for either ‘Contravention type’ OR ‘Issue’. Alternatively, use the ‘Search…’ box to find cases through a custom query.
Cases on the site currently cover parking, bus lane, moving traffic and road user charging, including the London Congestion Charge and Clean Air Zones (outside London). More cases and contravention types will be added in due course.
Please note: All adjudicator decisions included on this website are in the public domain. While they have been curated together here for the convenience and interest of users, any information contained within the decisions remains the responsibility of the original adjudicating body. Any questions relating to the content of cases should also be directed to the adjudicating body.
Mr M – v – Buckinghamshire Council
(AA00049-2307)
Traffic Penalty Tribunal
Decision Date: 2023-08-14
Outcome: Dismissed
This case clarifies that there is no requirement for a sign to be attached to the marked loading bay where restrictions are in force at all times.
Mr C – v – Cheshire West and Chester Council
(AW00041-2306)
Traffic Penalty Tribunal
Decision Date: 2023-07-07
Outcome: Dismissed
This case clarifies that a motorist seeking to use car park facilities is obliged to consider the conditions of use sign before leaving the car park. The obligation is on the motorist to look for the sign, even if they have not driven or parked close to it.
Mr K – v – Portsmouth City Council
(PO00021-2305)
Traffic Penalty Tribunal
Decision Date: 2023-06-23
Outcome: Dismissed
This case clarifies that under the statutory civil enforcement scheme, the owner of the vehicle remains liable for penalty charge, even if the vehicle was in the care of a third party.
The adjudicator’s decision in this case was confirmed in the High Court in:
R v the Parking Adjudicator ex parte The Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Wandsworth QBCOF 96/1153/D (opens in new tab).
This decision is therefore binding on adjudicators, meaning they must apply the principle to the facts of any relevant case.
Mr B – v – Sheffield City Council
(FD00130-2304)
Traffic Penalty Tribunal
Decision Date: 2023-06-07
Outcome: Dismissed
This case clarifies that yellow line restrictions apply to the carriageway, pavement and verge, and that an area the public can access can form part of the public highway, even if it is private land. Further, parking is not permitted adjacent to the restrictions marked by yellow lines in such areas. The cases also makes clear that the adjudicator cannot interfere in the authority’s exercise of discretion.
Fife Council – v – Mrs M
2024UT04 Ref: UTS/AP/23/0032
Upper Tribunal for Scotland
Decision Date: 2023-05-29
Outcome: Judicial Review
This case underscores that the responsibility rests with the motorist to purchase parking time for the correct vehicle A contravention occurs when parking time purchased does not correctly identify the vehicle parked. This applies even when the incorrect registration mark was entered in error. That a payment was still made is not relevant. The payment must be made for the correct vehicle, identified by the vehicle registration mark provided by the motorist.
The Scottish Upper Tribunal decision is binding on the Scottish First Tier Tribunal for Scotland (General Regulatory Chamber) and is a persuasive decision in other UK jurisdictions.
English (UK) 
Cymraeg